Resources
    SDN vs Traditional Networ ...
    26 September 24

    SDN vs Traditional Networking: Enterprise Architecture Guide

    Posted byBrian McGahan
    facebooktwitterlinkedin
    news-featured

    As Enterprise Networks evolve, businesses increasingly transition from traditional networking models to Software-Defined Networking (SDN) architectures. This has opened the door to a range of benefits, such as lower operating costs, faster deployment, more visibility, a reduction in downtime—especially that caused by human error—and ultimately, an improved client experience. However, these changes have also brought challenges for Networking Professionals, requiring a significant shift in the skills necessary to manage and optimize networks effectively.

    In this analysis, we’ll discuss the differences between a Traditional Networking approach and Software-Defined Networking (SDN), how the growing need for automation and centralized control in modern networks is shaping the future of network management, and how Networking Professionals who understand these changes can equip themselves with the skills and knowledge necessary to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving field.

    What is Traditional Networking?

    Traditional Networking relies on manually configuring and managing individual devices separately, such as routers, switches, or firewalls. This model has been the standard for decades and works well for smaller, less complex networks. However, as Enterprise Networks begin to scale, the shortcomings of these traditional methods start to become evident.

    Traditional Networking - Key Characteristics & Shortcomings

    • Manual Device Configuration: Network Engineers typically log in to each device and manually apply configurations. Not only is this process time-consuming, which leads to an increase in operational complexity and costs, but it also increases the likelihood of human error, and makes maintaining configuration consistency across devices a significant challenge.

    • Isolated Troubleshooting: In traditional networks, troubleshooting is typically performed on a device-by-device basis, making it challenging to diagnose issues that affect multiple devices. For instance, conducting packet flow analysis requires hop-by-hop data collection from each individual device, which is labor-intensive and time-consuming. This approach often leads to longer resolution times and increased application downtime.

    • Limited Network Visibility: Independent device management limits visibility into the network's overall health. This often results in additional expenses for commercial tools like SolarWinds or increased operational overhead to maintain open-source solutions like Cacti.  In either case, these bolt-on tools add complexity to the network’s operation.

    Despite these limitations, traditional networking still has its place, particularly in environments where scalability and automation are not primary concerns. However, for larger or more dynamic networks, traditional approaches become inefficient and can hinder a business’s ability to grow. In these environments, the advantages of adopting a Software-Defined Networking (SDN) approach begin to stand out.

    What is Software-Defined Networking (SDN)?

    Software-Defined Networking (SDN) introduces a fundamentally different approach by using centralized controllers to manage network devices. This shift enables more efficient configuration, monitoring, and troubleshooting by treating the entire network as a single, programmable entity rather than managing each device in isolation. SDN not only consolidates control of device configurations, but also allows for the implementation of centralized policies that can dynamically influence traffic flows based on real-time network conditions.

    Software-Defined Networking (SDN) - Key Characteristics & Advantages

    • Centralized Control & Automation: SDN architectures are built around a centralized controller, which serves as the “brain” of the Network. The controller has full visibility into the entire network, allowing it to manage and configure devices from a “single pane of glass” interface. Network devices, such as routers and switches, are configured and managed through the controller using templates and automation tools, limiting the need for manual intervention. Additionally, since the controller has a comprehensive view of the network, it can also program the devices to modify traffic flows in response to real-time conditions such as packet loss or latency (delay).

    • Deployment Consistency & Error Reduction: Using centralized templates allows administrators to maintain consistent configurations across devices. This not only ensures that all devices in the Network can be configured according to best practices, but it can also reduce the risk of exposure to cybersecurity issues. SDN controllers can also apply logic checks on configurations before pushing them to devices, reducing the risk of human error. The ability to roll back changes and use configuration checkpoints ensures that Network Administrators can quickly recover from mistakes, limiting network downtime.

    • Integrated Monitoring and Troubleshooting: SDN controllers also typically have built-in monitoring tools that provide real-time visibility into the network’s performance. Troubleshooting can be performed centrally, allowing engineers to analyze network traffic flows and performance from a single location. This can include packet captures and flow analysis, all from the controller’s GUI.

    • Infrastructure as Code (IaC): SDN Networks are programmable, meaning that policies, configurations, and traffic flows can be managed through software. This aligns with the broader trend toward DevOps practices, where Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is used to automate and deploy network configurations in much the same way that software is deployed. This shift allows for more agile, repeatable, and scalable network deployments, significantly speeding up the deployment process, and driving down operational costs.

    SDN vs. Traditional Networking: A Direct Comparison

    The shift from Traditional Networking to SDN is reshaping how Enterprise Networks are designed, managed, and maintained. Below is a comparative analysis of key features of Traditional Networking and SDN:

    Software Defined Networking (SDN) vs. Traditional Networking Chart

    Bridging the SDN Skills Gap

    The shift to Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is reshaping the role of Network Engineers, Administrators, and Operators. As SDN automates many tasks that were once manually managed, the focus is moving toward centralized management, network programmability, and a deeper understanding of network automation tools. To stay competitive in the industry, professionals will need to evolve their skill sets by mastering concepts like Infrastructure as Code (IaC), automation frameworks, and SDN-specific technologies. This shift emphasizes the importance of understanding not just traditional network configurations, but also how to manage and orchestrate networks through controllers and software.

    Continuous training is essential to bridge this skills gap, enabling professionals to adapt to this new landscape. INE offers a wealth of resources and courses focusing on SDN and Network Automation, helping engineers stay at the forefront of these developments. Some key courses include:

    The Future of Networking: Why SDN is the Way Forward

    While traditional Networking models may still be suitable for small-scale environments, the increasing complexity of Enterprise Networks makes SDN the superior choice for organizations looking to scale. SDN not only simplifies network management but also aligns with broader trends in IT, such as automation, Infrastructure as Code, and DevOps.

    Benefits to Businesses:

    For Enterprises, the benefits of moving to SDN are clear:

    • Cost Efficiency: SDN reduces the operational costs associated with manual network management and troubleshooting.

    • Faster Deployment Times: With automation and centralized control, SDN allows for faster, more agile network deployments.

    • Improved Client Experience: SDN’s enhanced monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities result in reduced downtime and better network performance.

    • Future-Proofing: As the IT landscape continues to evolve, businesses adopting SDN will be better positioned to take advantage of future advancements in automation, cloud integration, and DevOps.

    Conclusion

    The transition from traditional Networking to Software-Defined Networking (SDN) represents a significant paradigm shift in Enterprise Network architectures. With its centralized management, automation, and enhanced visibility, SDN offers clear advantages over traditional Networking methods. However, this transition also demands new skills from Network professionals, making continuous training and upskilling essential.

    Trust INE to Guide Your SDN Journey:

    As the IT landscape continues to evolve, Network Professionals can trust INE to provide the best training and resources to meet the demands of this rapidly changing environment. Whether you’re transitioning to Software-Defined Networking, embracing automation, or preparing for whatever comes next in the world of networking, INE's comprehensive videos, quizzes, and hands-on labs ensure that you're equipped with the knowledge and skills to stay ahead of the curve. From SDN to Network Automation, INE remains your partner in professional growth and innovation.

    Want to learn more about Enterprise Architecture?
    ⁠Check out our content here.

    © 2022 INE. All Rights Reserved. All logos, trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
    instagram Logofacebook Logotwitter Logolinkedin Logoyoutube Logo